Alex-Raymond T. | 2 years ago | 3 comments | 427 views

When we want to play on the transparency of a "Parent" 3d model, it is not systematically applied to the child object (via the container). Is it voluntary?
This forces to rework the transparency on the container. It would be convenient to avoid this pattern.
Namely that it could be interesting in certain cases to make the parent disappear while keeping the child and vice versa.
So I don't know if what I'm asking is really useful, but it will be good to know.
For your information, in this montage that I am preparing, there are two animations which follow each other: group of layers 12/13/14, then 8/9/10, one replacing the other, with an equipped paratrooper, not having couldn't find a ready-made free template on the net, hence the subject of this topic.
Another useful note:
When you double-click with "CTRL" pressed, the layer number appears in the cursor window of the "joined model" property. It's great if we reproduce the parent/child association with another animation, which is my case here.
I hope I don't see too much nonsense.
Thank you for everything.

You must be logged in before you can comment to this article. Login | Register